Wasteful Wenger

There are many reasons why Koscielny’s goal against a stubborn Newcastle could be the catalyst for much needed changed at Arsenal Football Club. There can be no denying that during Wenger’s 16 years in charge he has had some fantastic sides who have played beautiful football, but that is no longer the case. Even the most hardened of Arsenal fans would struggle to argue the fact that coming 4^th and going 8 years without a trophy is not course for concern and as for beautiful football some of what we have had to watch this season has resembled the style Chelsea used to employ with long balls up to Giroud and quick wingers around him. They no longer play beautiful football regularly and they no longer dominate sides and frankly too many of their players couldn’t play beautiful football if they tried.

What differences does finishing 4th this season, and gaining a place in the Champions League, has to the previous 16 years of doing exactly the same? Of course just like any other Champions League side you expect to attract better players, something a side like Liverpool have struggled to do since losing out on the top 4 places (Suarez aside), but it’s not like Arsenal haven’t always qualified for the Champions League and yet in recent times they haven’t managed to bring in top players. If reports are to be believed this year could be different, with sums such as ’70 million to spend’ being bandied about Wenger might finally dig into his pocket and make some significant signings.

I’m not writing this to suggest Wenger isn’t a great manager, he built a fantastic side ‘The Invincibles’, that should have been a foundation to continue to develop and bring in some world class players. He failed to do that and the club has suffered, with teams such as Chelsea and City spending millions of pounds and United always looking to progress Arsenal now find themselves exactly where they belong, fighting for 4^th place. Every year it seems he suggest his ‘young’ side need time to develop, well Wenger you have had 8 years to develop that young side and they did develop nicely for other clubs. He has been manager of Arsenal for 16 years and exactly half of them where fantastic the second half however has been pretty forgetful. The scenes on the final game where almost cringe worthy and although I tend not to agree with him to often Piers Morgan was bang on with his views that a club like Arsenal should not get the Champaign out just for coming 4^th in the Premier League. This once great footballing side have to resort to the last day to get in the Champions League not to win the Premier League.

Wenger was wasteful because he didn’t build on his success and he has been more wasteful with the money he has spent in the transfer market. He has done wonderful things bringing through some very talented youth players and making them into world class footballers, he has a keen eye for a bargain that has never changed. Players like Henry, Viera and in the current squad Arteta have all come in for relatively small prices and have performed amazingly and of course there are many other examples of bargain players. You could also argue that players he has invested in often are sold on for profit, especially with Man City’s obsession with buying Arsenal players Toure, Adebayor, Clichy and Nasri have all gone north for good profits. This is all very good but when it comes down to it and Wenger in pushed into spending top money he never seems to deliver the right players.

As far back as Reyes (20 millions), Arshavin (16.5 million) to Chamakh, Podolski and Gervinho. All of these players cost a lot of money came with a lot of expectation and as far as I can see failed to deliver. He has never properly replaced Seaman in goal, the famous back line is no longer that famous and the powerful midfield of Viera and Gilberto is much more lightweight. Henry went Van Persie stepped up he soon went to try and challenge for titles (similar to many other who went) and Wenger opted to buy a relatively cheap replacement more in hope than expectation. Imagine now an Arsenal side with the players who he has let go in their starting line-up, we wouldn’t be having a discussion about 4^th we would surely be talking about titles.

So he has let very good players leave and never really replaced them, often gambling on a bargain buy that doesn’t quite work or investing heavily in a player that performs well as and when he feels like it. If I owned Arsenal and I had 70 million pounds to spend I would hold onto that money, wait a year until Wenger leaves and then allow the new manager the chance to build a team he wants. There is no point allowing Wenger to invest in overpriced average players (such as Podolski) only for a new manager to have to attempt to offload them. You never know perhaps they will get a man in with a better track record in the transfer market!

Wenger is Wasteful because he wasted the chance to build on some amazing teams, he wasted the talent he and nurtured by allowing them to leave and more poignantly he wastes money when he does attempt to spend big. From where I’m sat that makes him a very wasteful man. 

The return of the ‘Special One’

My worry is everyone loves their first car, in your mind it is perfect and is all you dreamed of. Eventually it breaks down or you decide to move on to a new car and if, like I once did, you get a chance to drive that special first car again all those memories are dashed and the realisation sets in that actually the car you once loved is nothing more than a rusting piece of junk. The same could be said about your first girlfriend but I’ll leave you to fill those gaps in.

Jose Mourinhos first reign at Chelsea was all that the fans dreamed of for the whole of their lives, finally we had a man who would deliver that illusive Premier League title, the supporters instantly fell in love with this charming, charismatic man who had brought them so much hope. There can be absolutely no denying the quality he has as a football manager but we must be realistic about this. He took over a club with a very good core of players and then set about spending hundreds of millions of pounds to take that team to a whole new level. It worked and he delivered 2 league titles, an FA and 2 league cups and went close to getting the Champions League. However is it that unrealistic for me to suggest that give any good manager that sort of money and they could deliver something similar.

Not only did he bring success in his period but there has been a clear legacy left from his time at the club. That legacy has, even with change after change, still delivered trophy after trophy over the past 6 seasons. He brought in a mentality to the whole club, a toughness and togetherness that new that winning was everything. There was no resting on what you have achieved but a focus on the next trophy they could win. This attitude can be attributed to one man ‘The Special One’. What we must also remember is when he was famously sacked the football that the team where playing was poor, there was no free flowing, attacking football that the owner insists upon. The team were no longer champions and he had just watched a home draw against Rosenberg in the Champions League group stages. It was not all going swimmingly, the in club arguments had begun to escalate, just like at Madrid currently, and the owner decided to dispose of the fans hero without giving him a chance to put things right it must be said. 

What Chelsea will be getting is, without doubt, a world class successful manager. He has proved at Inter Millan and to a lesser extent Madrid that he can win things with different clubs. His attention to detail and strong bonds with players could turn a talented young Chelsea team into the next European force. He is a champion and this group of Chelsea players need that experience to go to the next level.

There has always been a question mark about Mourinho and that is, is he a manager for the long term or does he just bring success quickly then move on. In recent interviews he has suggested that at his age he is looking to find a club to settle down and build something 'similar to Ferguson' and where better to do it than at a club where he is already worshiped! If he is serious about building a club he must do something he is not renowned for and that is begin to introduce youthprospects into first team football. Again though Chelsea is a perfect place to do this with players such as Lukaku, Courtoisand Chalobah coming up he can begin to build a team that can dominate for a long time. Chelsea is a club that, after much turmoil, need some stability. The comings and goings haveseemingly not had an adverse effect on the results and their ability to challenge for major competitions, but imagine what they could have won with a stable management team who can implement their ideas throughout the whole club.

Perhaps Abramovich needs him more than Mourinho needs the club, with the fans uproar at the appointment of Benitez and the lack of alternatives of the same standard, this may in fact be the catalyst for change in the way the club is run. Mourinho may gain the control he craves and the owner may take a step back and allow the people who know about football to run the football side of the business. But many managers have so publicly come and gone from Chelsea in the years since Mourinho and the vast majority have managed to bring some sort of success to the club with Abramovichhaving his say. Even Benitez who has to work against all the anger surrounding his appointment managed to win a trophy.Mourinho has looked unstable at Madrid where he claims he in unloved. The fans at Chelsea will of course love him, but what if it starts to go wrong and how long before him andAbramovich begin to disagree? Im not sure he would even be in discussion if there was another viable option, but there’s not and Abramovich must concede and bring him back.

Don’t get me wrong I love the man, he is a hero and of course I want him back, I’m just simply worried that it might not work out and then where does the club go?

Follow me on Twitter for more opinions and thoughts @bobbietay